Introduction and First Reading
Bill introduced, on motion by Hon Lynn MacLaren, and read a first time.
Second Reading
HON LYNN MacLAREN (South Metropolitan) [10.15 am]: I move —
That the bill be now read a second time.
The coastal region of Western Australia is home to approximately 80 per cent of the state’s population, and much of it is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. The bill provides for the regulation of planning, development and management in the coastal zone in readiness for the impacts of climate change.
The question of what may be the most effective method of regulating state coastal planning in readiness for the impacts of climate change has been on the Greens’ agenda for many years. My own experience as an activist campaigning for better planning outcomes, following the sale of the railway marshalling yards for urban development at Leighton Beach in 2001, taught me firsthand the shortcomings of our planning system at that time. Subsequently, I have keenly observed the legislative responses to climate change of the other states in Australia and realised that Western Australia is lagging behind.
About 18 months ago, as the WA Greens spokesperson for planning, I released a discussion paper on this matter to a diverse group of stakeholders—geomorphologists, consultants, academics, non-government organisations, planners, local governments and lawyers—who have an interest in the forward planning and management of the coastal zone. On the basis of the invaluable feedback provided in response to the discussion paper, a draft bill was produced and that was subjected to further consultation. Further amendments were made and finally, during the thirty-eighth session of Parliament, on 29 March 2012 in this house I moved that the Climate Change Readiness (Coastal Planning and Protection) Bill 2012, being a bill for an act to provide for planning and development in the coastal zone, the management of the coastal zone and for related purposes be introduced and read a first time. That was the green bill. It was a draft for a third round of consultation that was even more rigorous than the first two drafts. I am pleased to say that most of the stakeholders with whom I consulted were generally supportive of the bill and made numerous constructive suggestions. A substantial amount of the feedback we received was incorporated into the bill, and it was introduced and read for the first time on 29 November 2012.
Since then we have of course had a state election and entered a new session of Parliament. I was therefore pleased to introduce the Climate Change Readiness (Coastal Planning and Protection) Bill 2013.
The PRESIDENT: Order, members! A second reading of a bill is being read and there are a lot of audible conversations. Members owe it to the member on her feet to give her the courtesy of listening to what the bill contains.
Hon LYNN MacLAREN: Thank you, Mr President.
As I was saying, with this bill’s reiteration in 2013, some minor but important changes have been made to the bill that are now before the house for consideration, and these are covered in detail in the explanatory memorandum. The most significant change is to the definition of “coastal compartment”. In coastal geomorphology, a coastal compartment is a component of the geological framework of the coast. The definition of “coastal compartment” in the bill now recognises that coastal compartments occur at different scales, and accordingly it provides definitions of primary, secondary and tertiary coastal compartments. This distinction is important, because the bill provides that a vulnerability assessment must in due course be prepared for the whole of the Western Australian coast. But not every assessment needs to be at the same scale. For example, in the Perth area, where the coast is heavily developed, the vulnerability assessment needs to be prepared in greater detail, called the tertiary level, than is the case in a remote area where development is sparse or non-existent, where an assessment at the larger scale, called the primary level, may be appropriate. The level at which the vulnerability assessment is prepared will then guide local governments as to the level at which local management and local adaptation plans should be prepared for coastal zones within their jurisdiction. This change was introduced in response to feedback provided by a local government through the Western Australian Local Government Association.
The time to act is now. Scientific evidence is telling us clearly that the climate is changing, and the impacts of climate change at a local level are well documented. Scientific predictions for Australia over the coming decades indicate that our most populous regions will be affected by fluctuating temperatures, rising sea levels, more frequent and intense storms, increased aridity, and flooding.
Extract from Hansard
[COUNCIL —Thursday, 20 June 2013]
Hon Lynn MacLaren; President

The Climate Commission, established specifically to provide all Australians with an independent and reliable
source of information about the science of climate change, has provided very clear analyses of how climate
change is playing out in Western Australia. On 17 June 2013, it launched its twenty-sixth report, “The Critical
Decade 2013: Climate change science, risks and responses”. That report states that many consequences of
climate change are already evident. The risks of further climate change are also better understood. Although
extreme weather events have always occurred naturally, the global climate system is hotter and wetter than it
was 50 years ago. In Australia, the influence of climate change on extreme weather events is clear. More intense
weather events pose serious risks to our societies and to natural ecosystems. To quote directly from the critical
decade report 2013 —
Northwest Australia has experienced a significant increase in the frequency of heavy rainfall events
The summary report, “The Critical Decade 2013: A summary of climate change science, risks and responses”,
states at page 3 —
Sea-level rise poses serious risks to Australia’s coastal infrastructure by increasing the risk of flooding
from storm surges and high tides ... The combined value of commercial, light industrial, transport and
residential buildings at risk from a sea-level rise of 1.1 m was valued at approximately $226 billion
(2008 replacement value), with exposure highest in Queensland in terms of both replacement value and
total number of properties and infrastructure.
The Climate Commission’s presentation on the impacts on Western Australia lists eight direct threats. Four of
these—bleaching of iconic reefs, eroding of beaches, rising sea levels, and coastal flooding—directly concern
the mitigation efforts we must put in place for our coastal regions. The other four—higher temperatures,
declining rainfall in the south west, water supply risks, and threats to rare species—would all benefit from
mitigation efforts aimed at reducing our carbon footprint.
We can pretend that it is not happening or that it is not our problem, or we can act now to mitigate and adapt to
these impacts. This bill is the Greens’ response to that pressing call to act now. The bill seeks to codify four
important principles. The first is that planning decisions should be based on the most up-to-date climate science
to protect vulnerable biodiversity hotspots, natural environments and recreational values of the coast. The second
is that planning decisions should be able to accommodate the effects of the changing coastal environment on our
urban infrastructure and the impacts of our urban infrastructure on the coastal environment, in order to protect
both. The third is that local governments are fundamental to the implementation of good planning decisions.
They need to have in place proactive adaptation and management strategies that adopt principles of adaptive
management that are flexible enough to accommodate updated climate projections. The fourth and final principle
is that planning decisions must reflect the precautionary principle that the avoidance of future risk is the most
cost-effective adaptation response, particularly where development has not yet occurred.
The bill is intended to work in conjunction with “State Planning Policy 2.6 — State Coastal Planning”, and
guidelines, drafts of which were released for public comment last year. The bill provides the contemporary
planning law that is needed to address climate change. SPP 2.6 will provide the policy foundation and
framework that will support the bill. In line with SPP 2.6, a projected rise in global mean sea level of 0.9 metres
by 2110 has been adopted for the purposes of the bill. The Environmental Protection Authority has the
responsibility for keeping climate science up to date and to notify relevant public authorities of changes. There
are regular reviews embedded in the bill to accommodate updated climate science projections.
SPP 2.6 and the associated policy guidelines are largely consistent with the bill’s requirements to provide
guidelines for the development of the WA coastal plan and local coastal plans. The fundamental difference is
that the bill’s provisions would have legislative effect, while most of the policy measures in SPP 2.6 promote
good practice but are not mandatory. In many respects, the bill also goes further than SPP 2.6 in guiding coastal
climate change adaptation and management by local governments, and giving clear legislative direction to
important planning decisions that protect human settlements and ecological communities from coastal hazards
that are being exacerbated by climate change.
There is a planning gap in the existing planning regime as it applies to WA’s coastal zone. The metropolitan
region scheme is the predominant planning scheme for land use in Perth and sets the framework for land use and
development in the metropolitan area. The Peel region scheme is the key planning scheme that guides land use in
the Peel region, including the local government boundaries of the City of Mandurah and the shires of Murray and
Waroona. The Greater Bunbury region scheme covers the City of Bunbury and the shires of Harvey, Dardanup
and Capel. Neither the region schemes nor the statutes mentioned specifically contemplate the vulnerability of
the Western Australian coast to the impacts of climate change.
The bill plugs that gap by providing that over a specified period a vulnerability assessment must be carried out,
firstly for developed areas of the coast, but ultimately for the whole coast. Based on the vulnerability assessment,
Extract from Hansard
[COUNCIL —Thursday, 20 June 2013]
Hon Lynn MacLaren; President

a WA coastal plan will be prepared. The plan will identify the coastal zone and include a map showing the coastal compartments and sediment cells comprising the coastal zone. It will also identify the “transition zone”, which is the area of the coastal zone most likely to be vulnerable to adverse impacts of a coastal hazard, either current or future.
Under the Bill, each local government or other controlling body of land in the coastal zone must prepare an adaptation plan and a management plan—each of which is a local coastal plan—to ensure integrated management for the protection of the environmental, social, cultural and economic values of the coast. The WA coastal plan sets out adaptation and management principles, guidelines and measures for the coastal zone, which give direction to the local coastal plans that must be prepared by local governments. The WA coastal plan must be developed in consultation with the public and have regard to Aboriginal traditional owners’ distinct cultures, identities and connections to land and sea.
The bill regulates development in the transition zone. The only development permitted in the transition zone will be exempt development, which essentially is minor changes to existing developments or essential services infrastructure; and short-term development, which essentially is development for public use that by its nature needs to be close to the coast and is capable of being abandoned, if necessary, without significant impact on the transition zone.
Under the bill, it may be possible to obtain development approval for marinas. But significant canal developments, such as that proposed at Point Peron, would be prohibited.
The remainder of the bill includes the following provisions: memorials on title must be placed on land within the transition zone; where development in the transition zone is damaged by the impact of a coastal hazard, the Western Australian Planning Commission may cause a coastal protection notice to be given requiring the owner or occupier, or another person, to remove the development and restore the land to its previous condition; a land surrender condition for coastal management purposes may be applied to approvals for subdivision or amalgamation of lots within the transition zone; the bill affords protection to protected persons, as defined, for anything done in good faith in the performance or purported performance of a function under the bill; no compensation is payable in respect of land that is injuriously affected by the making of or amendment to the WA coastal plan or a local coastal plan; and the Coastal Planning and Coordination Council will be reactivated to advise the WAPC on matters relating to coastal planning and coordination throughout the state and to fulfil certain functions as set out in the bill.
In conclusion, I very briefly refer to the World Bank report released last year entitled “Turn Down the Heat: Why a 4°C Warmer World Must be Avoided”. The report reminds us that scientists are nearly unanimous in predicting a four degrees warmer world by the end of the century, without serious policy changes. I can do no better than quote a few cautionary words from the report —
The 4°C scenarios are devastating: the inundation of coastal cities; increasing risks for food production potentially leading to higher malnutrition rates; many dry regions becoming dryer, wet regions wetter; unprecedented heat waves in many regions, especially in the tropics; substantially exacerbated water scarcity in many regions; increased frequency of high-intensity tropical cyclones; and irreversible loss of biodiversity, including coral reef systems.
And most importantly, a 4°C world is so different from the current one that it comes with high uncertainty and new risks that threaten our ability to anticipate and plan for future adaptation needs.
The lack of action on climate change not only risks putting prosperity out of reach of millions of people in the developing world, it threatens to roll back decades of sustainable development.
I commend to members this small contribution that we can make here in Western Australia to the serious policy changes needed to avoid the consequences of doing nothing, so clearly outlined in the World Bank report.
Pursuant to standing order 126(1), I advise that this bill is not a uniform legislation bill. It will not ratify or give effect to an intergovernmental or multilateral agreement to which the government is a party, nor will it, by reason of its subject matter, introduce a uniform scheme or uniform law throughout the commonwealth.
In closing, I thank my staff member Dinny Laurence who assisted me in developing this bill, which took maybe three years from the research stage to this introduction. Her work was exemplary. Her ability to synthesise the information that we received was nothing short of outstanding. Ms Laurence has retired now. I wish her well in her retirement. I hope that we can pass this bill at some stage to ensure that she can enjoy her retirement somewhere along the Western Australian coast.
I hereby table the explanatory memorandum and commend the bill to the house.