- Roe 8 / Beeliar Wetlands
- Climate Change Coastal Impacts
- Coal Mining in Margaret River
- Cockburn Cement
- Homophobic bullying
- Jandakot Bushland Clearance
- Live Animal Exports
- No WA Shark Cull
- Point Peron Marina
- Protect Peaceful Protest
- Safe Passing Distances Bill - a Metre Matters
- Same Sex Marriage
- Stop GM Crops
- Current Issues
- Take Action
- Bills Introduced 2012
- Bills debated
- Budget Estimates Hearings
- Committee Reports
- Disallowance Motions
- Guide to Petitions
- How we can help
- Learn About Parliament
- Motions Debated
- Questions on Notice
- Questions without Notice 2009
- Questions without Notice 2010
- Questions without Notice 2011
Environmental impacts of Perth Waterfront Project should be properly assessed
Hon Lynn MacLaren MLC, the Greens spokesperson on planning, has criticised the decision by the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) today not to assess the Perth Waterfront proposal.
“A project of such significance and scale along the city’s waterfront should be properly assessed for any potential environmental impacts by the EPA,” said Ms MacLaren.
“This is a unique opportunity to reshape the city-river connection. Perth deserves a firm commitment to deliver public infrastructure and a proper environmental assessment.”
“A wide range of groups have raised concerns that the Waterfront plan is overscale and will harm the heritage and amenity value of the area. The fact that the EPA will not be formally assessing the project raises additional concerns about its potential environmental impacts,” said Ms MacLaren.
“Concerns have been raised regarding the impacts of the project on river life. The river’s resident population of dolphins are already under stress. There may also be impacts to invertebrates and fish. These impacts need to be properly assessed to ensure that any potential adverse effects can be properly managed,” said Ms MacLaren.
“The Waterfront Project is the first cab off the rank for the Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority. The risk is that this powerful body will be a law unto itself. The fact that the EPA isn’t assessing the project might be a dangerous sign of things to come,” concluded Ms MacLaren.